A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning potential neighbours over the construction of the wall in a coastal site within a north Dublin suburb, a circumstance which has captivated countrywide focus pursuing an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of planning breaches, environmental issues, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Periods article about René Collier and also the Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a remarkably publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development will work at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, search for to build their spouse and children property. The case is now emblematic of wider disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where improvement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of proven inhabitants. According to the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming made by their prospective neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted beneath arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally inhabitants of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their scheduling permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result places are subject matter to demanding controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have lasting ecological implications, specifically inside of a delicate coastal environment which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their preparing authorization, and say the wall, which can be partially developed, is in the right placement. Their authorized workforce has characterised the motion being an attempt to hold off or frustrate a lawful progress. The few accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their look at, an allegation that's been recurring in court and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal arranging disputes, in which views of The ocean are each hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular initiatives via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In accordance with sworn proof referenced from the Irish Instances. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by means of waist-large h2o all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times, a picture that has given that develop into emblematic with the depth of the dispute. These actions were not merely symbolic; they were meant to Obtain visual evidence in the wall’s position relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from the sea Irish Times claimed, describing how The 2 Adult males entered the drinking water for the duration of significant weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the internet site became Among the most placing descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Moments write-up about accountant Paul Feely noted that these steps had been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was getting encroached on.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were protected in detail by the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to grasp the track record and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court listened to further submissions on no matter whether interim orders should be granted to halt development pending an entire hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important instant during the lawful timeline.
Within the Main with the dispute is usually a disagreement around boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain that the wall, as manufactured, goes past what was authorized Rene Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has long been referred to as meticulous in his evaluation of scheduling documents, maps, and conditions connected to the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their motion is enthusiastic by concern for environmental safety and adherence to scheduling regulation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving a private check out, insisting rather that it is about making certain that development at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological limits. In affidavits, they've got described their prolonged-standing link to the world and their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a few simply just looking to develop a household dwelling in accordance with the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches on a Special Place of Conservation and say that all is effective are already performed according to Experienced guidance and accredited plans. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as coming into The ocean during a storm, tend not to change the underlying facts.
The case has also raised broader questions about how setting up disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of construction of wall at coastal internet site has grown to be a shorthand description for just a problem that numerous observers see as significantly widespread. As sea concentrations rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation amongst non-public land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming far more contentious.
The Irish Periods post about René Collier observed the businessman experienced Earlier been involved with local advocacy on preparing and environmental challenges, while not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Times posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from quite different Expert backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, have become synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-higher drinking water all through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Situations and René Collier waded as a result of midsection-high water all through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both equally the physical actuality on the coastline and the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see as an extreme solution.
Because the High Court proceedings continue on, the outcome stays unsure. The courtroom have to ascertain whether or not the wall as constructed complies with scheduling permission and regardless of whether any encroachment right into a Distinctive Area of Conservation has occurred. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging problems. Nevertheless the human component stays central: neighbours who have to Dwell alongside each other long once the authorized expenses have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction is effective at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case extend outside of that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. Furthermore, it underscores how rapidly a local disagreement can escalate when essential problems which include environmental defense and property legal rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of all-natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre on the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it is going to finally be altered, removed, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Just about the most closely viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.